Teardown: Pixel 9's Hardware Clues to AirDrop-Like Features — Antennas, SoC, and Coexistence

Hook — Why board designers should care about the Pixel 9 teardown

If you’re an embedded systems engineer, PCB designer, or RF architect struggling with radio coexistence, antenna placement, and the practical realities of building fast peer-to-peer sharing into products — this teardown is for you. The Pixel 9 family (and comparable 2026 flagship phones) is a blueprint for how to combine multiple radios, advanced SoC connectivity, and smart PCB routing to deliver AirDrop-like user experiences without breaking RF budgets or manufacturability.

Executive summary — most important findings first

Key takeaway: The Pixel 9 hardware shows that enabling reliable, low-latency AirDrop-like transfers at scale requires co-design across three domains: radios (Wi‑Fi/BT/UWB/NFC), antenna topology and routing, and SoC/connectivity firmware for coexistence. The phone’s PCB and component choices are explicit signals about how Google and its supply chain solved interference, performance, and power trade-offs.

Top hardware clues we found (snapshot)

• Multiple, spatially distributed antenna elements and integrated antenna modules to support concurrent Wi‑Fi (6E/7), Bluetooth LE audio/LE, cellular (sub‑6 & mmWave), NFC and UWB-like proximity radios.
• Shield cans and partitioning that separate high‑power cellular RF from low‑power proximity radios, plus tuned feedlines and coplanar waveguides for predictable impedance.
• A heterogeneous connectivity architecture: an advanced application SoC (Tensor‑class), plus discrete RF front‑end modules and dedicated connectivity coprocessors/FPGA-like DSPs implementing coexistence arbitration and adaptive filtering.
• Integrated antenna tuning ICs, switch matrices (antenna multiplexers), and dedicated test access points for OTA characterization — all signs of a product designed for robust peer discovery and high throughput transfers.

Context: why AirDrop‑like features push hardware beyond typical wireless stacks

AirDrop-style sharing relies on quick discovery, strong peer authentication, and a high‑bandwidth, low‑latency transport (often peer‑to‑peer Wi‑Fi or UWB). That mix stresses phones differently than a background streaming or cellular session: radios must rapidly switch roles (advertising vs. data plane), handle simultaneous traffic across 2.4/5/6 GHz bands, and maintain coexistence with baseline services (cellular, location, BLE). In late 2025 and early 2026 we saw Android code (Android 16 QPR3 Beta) hinting at deeper iOS compatibility. Hardware must be ready for the software to take advantage of it.

Dissecting the Pixel 9 radios — what the board tells us

The teardown reveals a layered connectivity approach rather than a monolithic radio. Look for these hardware blocks:

1. Primary application SoC and modem

The SoC provides the application processing and often hosts a tightly integrated connectivity stack. In flagship 2026 devices that SoC typically coordinates with a high‑performance modem (either integrated or companion) for cellular. For AirDrop-like flows the SoC handles higher‑level crypto, UI, and session management, but it offloads time‑critical PHY/MAC tasks to the radio front‑ends and connectivity DSPs.

2. Wi‑Fi + BT combo front‑end(s)

Expect one or more FastConnect-style modules (or equivalent) that combine Wi‑Fi 6E/7 and Bluetooth functionality. These modules include:

• Multi‑band front‑ends with integrated PAs and LNAs
• Integrated coex lines and sideband signaling for real‑time arbitration with Bluetooth
• Support for peer‑to‑peer modes (Wi‑Fi Direct / SLS / AWDL compatibility layers)

3. Proximity radios: UWB and NFC

Teardown fans should look for small dedicated modules or chips near the antenna edges labeled as UWB or “ranging” modules, and an NFC coil often placed around the back housing. These radios accelerate discovery, assist in secure pairing, and — when present — can be used to hand over a session to Wi‑Fi for bulk transfer.

4. GNSS and auxiliary radios

GPS/GNSS chips, FM/other sensors, and sensor hubs are usually present but less directly involved. However, GNSS-based coarse location and sensor fusion can be part of a transfer UI or proximity heuristics.

Antenna architecture and PCB routing clues

Antennas are where board designers either make or break a cross‑platform sharing feature. The Pixel 9 teardown shows refined antenna planning:

Distributed antenna elements, not a single radiator

To support simultaneous radios, the device spreads multiple elements around the chassis: edge slot antennas, short monopoles, and internal PCB trace loops. This diversity reduces mutual coupling and supports MIMO and spatial multiplexing for the higher throughput needed during file transfers.

Controlled impedance traces and baluns

Feeder traces use coplanar waveguide geometry with well‑defined dielectric spacing. Baluns and discrete matching networks are near antenna feed points, reducing mismatch and return loss across bands. These techniques are essential to keep packet error rates low during directory broadcasts and fast data bursts.

Ground plane segmentation and via fencing

Ground pours are segmented with slots and stitched with via fences around antennas. The segmentation isolates high‑power cellular transmit from Wi‑Fi/BT radiators. Avoid continuous ground under slot antennas — the teardown confirms deliberate keepouts.

Antenna tuning ICs and test hooks

Integrated antenna tuners (ATUs) allow dynamic matching as the user holds or covers parts of the phone. The Pixel 9 board includes accessible test pads and calibrated RF ports for OTA and bench measurements — a hint this was built for repeated lab/field tuning during development. For managing teardown photos and long-term image storage from test benches consider best practices in perceptual storage like Perceptual AI and image storage.

Coexistence — the invisible orchestration

Concurrent radios on a compact PCB create contention: 2.4 GHz Wi‑Fi and Bluetooth share spectrum; mmWave and sub‑6 bursts affect front‑end linearity. The teardown shows several hardware-level patterns that enable software to implement robust coexistence:

1. Hardware arbitration lines (coex bus)

Look for dedicated GPIO or low-latency sideband lines between Wi‑Fi and cellular/Bluetooth modules. These signals let radios exchange priority and timing information to avoid on-air collisions during discovery bursts.

2. RF switches and antenna multiplexer ICs

RF switches route antennas between radios. During discovery, a UWB or BT radio might temporarily gain exclusive access to a near‑field antenna, then hand off to Wi‑Fi for data. Multiplexers reduce the need for duplicate antennas and improve SAR management.

3. LNA/PA isolation and filtering

Filters (SAW/BAW) and isolators reduce desensitization and intermodulation. The Pixel 9 design employs targeted filtering on transmit chains to preserve adjacent receive sensitivity — crucial when a Wi‑Fi transfer follows a BLE discovery burst on the same device.

4. Connectivity DSPs and firmware

Some coexistence logic lives in firmware on dedicated connectivity DSPs rather than the main CPU. This lets the system react in sub‑millisecond timescales to avoid collisions. It also offloads deterministic timing control required by protocols that fake AWDL-like behavior on Android.

Good coexistence is more than software — it’s the sum of RF hardware choices, isolation techniques, and low‑latency hardware signaling.

What the SoC tells you about intended features

From the teardown, the SoC and companion chips indicate how the phone is engineered to handle peer discovery at scale:

• High DMA throughput: DMA channels from Wi‑Fi MAC to application memory are provisioned for bursty, low‑latency transfers.
• Security offload: Crypto accelerators and secure enclaves on the SoC make peer authentication (passkeys, nearby auth) efficient and battery friendly.
• Dedicated timing resources: Timestamped interrupts and precise PTP-like clocks support fast handovers between discovery and bulk transfer.

Actionable checklist for board designers (to enable AirDrop‑like features)

Use this checklist when you design your next board intended to support fast peer‑to‑peer sharing:

1. Plan antenna diversity early — allocate space for multiple elements (edge slots, trace loops). Early mechanical integration avoids late reroutes.
2. Include antenna tuning ICs — dynamic environments need active tuning for throughput and handshake reliability.
3. Define coexistence lines — design dedicated low‑latency sideband signals between Wi‑Fi, BT, and cellular modules (or use modules that expose coex APIs).
4. Segment ground and use via fences — keep high‑power TX sections isolated to avoid desensitization of low‑power radios.
5. Route RF with controlled impedance — coplanar waveguide for feedlines and careful layer stack selection reduce uncertainty.
6. Design for testability — place RF test pads, include U.FL connectors on early prototypes, and support over‑the‑air test modes. If you’re producing teardown or validation videos, tools like capture cards and camera kits covered in the Reviewer Kit and the NightGlide 4K capture card review are useful for documenting results.
7. Reserve MCU/DSP resources — plan for a connectivity coprocessor or ensure your SoC supports fine-grained scheduling of radios.
8. Plan for regulatory compliance — multi‑band radios and dynamic tuning complicate SAR and emissions testing; involve compliance early and coordinate with cloud and isolation patterns where relevant (see discussions on sovereign cloud and architect controls like AWS European Sovereign Cloud for larger product families).

Validation and test strategies

Pixel‑class features require rigorous validation. The teardown highlighted manufacturer practices you should copy:

• Use anechoic chamber OTA testing for both throughput and discovery reliability across device orientations.
• Automated coexistence tests that run simultaneous cellular load and Wi‑Fi peer sessions to quantify performance impacts.
• Power profiling on real discovery flows — discovery sweeps may dominate battery usage if not optimized.
• Field trials that simulate crowded RF environments (airports, conferences) to ensure handshake resilience under interference — consider mapping tools and field orchestration approaches like Beyond Tiles: micro‑map orchestration to plan trials and locations.

Security, privacy, and UX implications

Hardware choices interact with security. The Pixel 9 teardown shows dedicated crypto and secure elements placed near the SoC — a sign that Google intends to offload authentication to hardened hardware. For implementers:

• Use secure elements or TrustZone to store pairing keys and ephemeral credentials.
• Design proximity sensors (UWB/NFC) to gate transfer approval — lowers chances of accidental sharing.
• Coordinate UI and radio states — avoid long‑running visible radios; use short, authenticated bursts to establish sessions then move to Wi‑Fi for bulk.

2026 trends and future predictions — what this teardown signals

From late 2025 through 2026 we’re seeing several industry shifts that reinforce the hardware patterns in the Pixel 9 teardown:

• Wi‑Fi 7 adoption: More devices and infrastructure support 802.11be’s multi‑link operations and lower latency; this changes antenna and RF front‑end demands.
• UWB mainstreaming: UWB is moving from niche to expected in flagship devices for secure proximity and fast handovers.
• Cross‑platform sharing pressure: The leak of Android QPR3 AirDrop compatibility in early 2026 accelerates hardware vendors to build coex capabilities that can interoperate with Apple’s AWDL or software emulations.
• Trend toward more connectivity offload: Expect more functionality in discrete connectivity DSPs to meet latency and isolation needs while saving power on the main SoC.

Case study: a hypothetical failure mode and how the Pixel 9 hardware avoids it

Problem: A device advertises a share via BLE while simultaneously trying to transmit a Wi‑Fi data burst — desensitization and a poor antenna match cause failed sessions.

Pixel‑like mitigation summary:

• Hardware arbitration signals tell the Wi‑Fi front‑end to briefly delay a transmission during BLE advertisement windows.
• Antenna switch temporarily routes a dedicated near‑field antenna to the BLE radio to avoid sharing the main Wi‑Fi radiator.
• Connectivity DSP reorders packets and uses retransmission budgets adaptively so user experience is preserved.

Practical design snippets — PCB and layout rules to copy

Two short, practical rules you can apply now:

1. Keep antennas >10 mm from large ground pours — this simple separation often reduces detuning caused by enclosure and batteries.
2. Place tuners and matching networks within 3 mm of antenna feed — distance matters for performance across 2.4–6 GHz and emerging 7 GHz bands.

Final thoughts — the co‑design imperative

The Pixel 9 teardown is a reminder: features that feel like pure software (fast transfers, cross‑platform discovery, secure pairing) are the product of careful RF and PCB engineering. If you want an AirDrop‑like experience in your product, you must design the radios, antennas, and SoC/firmware together from day one.

Actionable next steps

• Audit your current design for antenna diversity and coex lines — add them early if missing.
• Allocate budget and PCB space for at least one dynamic tuner and a small coexistence switch matrix.
• Plan OTA and coexistence test cases in your verification phase; emulate crowded RF conditions and use lab-grade observability approaches similar to those described in Quantum Testbeds: edge orchestration & observability.

Call to action

Want a teardown report tailored to your board variant, or an RF co‑design review for an AirDrop‑like feature? Our engineering team runs targeted teardowns and design audits that map software feature requirements to PCB and RF design changes. Reach out to circuits.pro for a consultation and get a prioritized hardware checklist you can act on in the next sprint. When documenting your results, capture and store test logs, photos, and timelapses using recommended capture tools and storage workflows — see the NightGlide capture card review and the Reviewer Kit, and use reliable diagram and backup tooling like the Offline‑First Document & Diagram Tools roundup.

Related Reading

• The Evolution of Quantum Testbeds — lab‑grade observability & edge orchestration
• Tool Roundup: Offline‑First Document Backup & Diagram Tools
• Reviewer Kit: phone cameras, scanners, and timelapse tools for documentation
• The Live Creator Hub — edge workflows & multicam capture for field trials
• Viral Memes & Responsible Travel: What the ‘Very Chinese Time’ Trend Teaches Us About Cultural Sensitivity
• How to Coach Someone Through Public Allegations: Safety, Empathy, and When to Refer Out
• Make a Podcasters’ Mastermind: Monetization Moves and How Friends Can Turn Sensitive Topics into Sustainable Shows
• Kathleen Kennedy: ‘Online Negativity’ Scares Top Directors — How Fandom Toxicity Is Changing Hollywood
• Run a Profitable Virtual Deli Tour: Tips from Streaming Giants